Coping Mechanisms and Privacy Concerns in Digital Health on Social Media
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55578/isgm.2507.001Keywords:
Digital Health, Coping Mechanisms, Misinformation, Privacy Protection, Social Media Platforms, Healthcare Providers, Health Literacy, Professional AccountabilityAbstract
Background: Digital platforms, particularly social media sites like TikTok, have emerged as influential tools for health communication and peer support. However, they present challenges, including the possible spread of misinformation, privacy concerns, and limited professional oversight.
Aim: This review investigates the coping mechanisms patients and healthcare providers adopt to manage the risks and challenges encountered on social media platforms within digital health environments.
Methods: A scoping review was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus literature. Studies were selected based on relevance, quality, and methodological rigour, focusing on strategies addressing misinformation, privacy protection, and professional accountability.
Findings: Digital platforms facilitate health information sharing and community support but also expose users to risks such as unverified content and privacy violations. A lack of consistent verification mechanisms for healthcare professionals and insufficient regulatory frameworks increases users’ vulnerability to misinformation and unethical practices.
Conclusion and Recommendations: To improve safety and outcomes in digital health spaces, the review recommends stricter social media guidelines for healthcare providers, increased efforts to improve digital health literacy, and enhanced privacy protections. Strengthening regulatory oversight is essential to ensure the credibility and safety of health information shared online.
References
1. World Health Organization. (2025, March 26). Universal health coverage (UHC). World Health Organization. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/universal-health-coverage
2. Topol, E. (2019). Deep medicine: How artificial intelligence can make healthcare human again. Basic Books.
3. Chou, S. W. Y., Gaysynsky, A., & Cappella, J. N. (2020). Where we go from here: Health misinformation on social media. American Journal of Public Health, 110(S3), S273-S275. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305905
4. Bene, B. A., Ibeneme, S., Fadahunsi, K. P., Harri, B. I., Ukor, N., Mastellos, N., Majeed, A., & Car, J. (2024). Regulatory standards and guidance for the use of health apps for self-management in Sub-Saharan Africa: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e49163. https://doi.org/10.2196/49163
5. Shaw, J. A., & Donia, J. (2021). The sociotechnical ethics of digital health: A critique and extension of approaches from bioethics. Frontiers in Digital Health, 3, 725088. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2021.725088
6. Mumtaz, H., Riaz, M. H., Wajid, H., Saqib, M., Zeeshan, M. H., Khan, S. E., Chauhan, Y. R., Sohail, H., & Vohra, L. I. (2023). Current challenges and potential solutions to the use of digital health technologies in evidence generation: A narrative review. Frontiers in Digital Health, 5, 1203945. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2023.1203945
7. Nittas, V., Daniore, P., Chavez, S. J., & Wray, T. B. (2024). Challenges in implementing cultural adaptations of digital health interventions. Communications Medicine, 4, 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-023-00426-2
8. Ventola, C. L. (2014). Social media and healthcare professionals: Benefits, risks, and best practices. Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 39(7), 491-501
9. Vayena, E., Haeusermann, T., Adjekum, A., & Blasimme, A. (2018). Digital health: Meeting the ethical and policy challenges. Swiss Medical Weekly, 148, w14571. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2018.14571
10. Eysenbach, G. (2001). What is e-health? Journal of Medical Internet Research, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3.2.e20
11. Omboni, S., Padwal, R. S., Alessa, T., Benczúr, B., Green, B. B., Hubbard, I., Kario, K., Khan, N. A., Konradi, A., Logan, A. G., Lu, Y., Mars, M., McManus, R. J., Melville, S., Neumann, C. L., Parati, G., Renna, N. F., Ryvlin, P., Saner, H., . . . Wang, J. (2022). The worldwide impact of telemedicine during COVID-19: Current evidence and recommendations for the future. Connected health, 1, 7. https://doi.org/10.20517/ch.2021.03
12. Bouabida, K., Lebouché, B., & Pomey, P. (2022). Telehealth and COVID-19 pandemic: An overview of the telehealth use, advantages, challenges, and opportunities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare, 10(11), 2293. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10112293
13. Chen, J., & Wang, Y. (2021). Social media use for health purposes: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(5), e17917. https://doi.org/10.2196/17917
14. Basch, C. H., Hillyer, G. C., Zagnit, E. A., & Basch, C. E. (2020). YouTube coverage of COVID-19 vaccine development: Implications for awareness and uptake. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 16(11), 2582-2585. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2020.1790280
15. Garett, R., & Young, S. D. (2022). The role of social media in monitoring COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 28(4), 650. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13656
16. Smailhodzic, E., Hooijsma, W., Boonstra, A., & Langley, D. J. (2016). Social media use in healthcare: A systematic review of effects on patients and on their relationship with healthcare professionals. BMC Health Services Research, 16(1), Article 410. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1691-0
17. Bussey, L. G., & Sillence, E. (2019). The role of internet resources in health decision-making: A qualitative study. Digital Health, 5, 2055207619888073. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207619888073
18. Badr, J., Motulsky, A., & Denis, J. (2024). Digital health technologies and inequalities: A scoping review of potential impacts and policy recommendations. Health Policy, 146, 105122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105122
19. Alyafei, A., & Easton-Carr, R. (2024, May 19). The Health Belief Model of behavior change. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK606120/
20. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
21. Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, Article 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
22. Hohlfeld, A., Kredo, T., & Clarke, M. (2024). A scoping review of activities intended to reduce publication bias in randomised trials. Systematic Reviews, 13, Article 310. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02742-1
23. Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., & Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
24. Hohlfeld, A., Kredo, T., & Clarke, M. (2024). A scoping review of activities intended to reduce publication bias in randomised trials. Systematic Reviews, 13, Article 310. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02742-1
25. Sharma, D., & Gahane, S. (2024). Connecting health and technology: A comprehensive review of social media and online communities in healthcare. Cureus, 16(3), e55361. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.55361
26. Guraya, S. S., Guraya, S. Y., & Bahri Yusoff, M. S. (2021). Preserving professional identities, behaviors, and values in digital professionalism using social networking sites: A systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 21, 381. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02802-9
27. Paul, M., Maglaras, L., Ferrag, M. A., & Almomani, I. (2023). Digitisation of healthcare sector: A study on privacy and security concerns. ICT Express, 9(4), 571-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2023.02.007
28. Xiang, D., & Cai, W. (2021). Privacy protection and secondary use of health data: Strategies and methods. BioMed Research International, 2021, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6967166
29. Filkins, B. L., Kim, J. Y., Roberts, B., Armstrong, W., Miller, M. A., Hultner, M. L., Castillo, A. P., Ducom, C., Topol, E. J., & Steinhubl, S. R. (2016). Privacy and security in the era of digital health: What should translational researchers know and do about it? American Journal of Translational Research, 8(3), 1560. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4859641/
30. European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union, L119, 1-88. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32016R0679
31. The Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (POPIA). (2013). Republic of South Africa. Retrieved from https://www.gov.za/documents/protection-personal-information-act
32. Swales, L. (2022). The Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 in the context of health research: Enabler of privacy rights or roadblock? PER, 25(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2022/v25i0a11180. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1727-37812022000100008&lng=en&nrm=iso
33. Fernandes, F., & Chaltikyan, G. (2020). Analysis of legal and regulatory frameworks in digital health: A comparison of guidelines and approaches in the European Union and United States. Journal of the International Society for Telemedicine and EHealth, 8, e11 (1-13). https://doi.org/10.29086/JISfTeH.8.e11
34. Chandrakar, E., & Dahiya, A. (2024). The legal and public health implications of digital health technologies. South Eastern European Journal of Public Health, 2024, Article 1289. https://doi.org/10.70135/seejph.vi.1289
35. Keller, E. J., Mlambo, V. C., Resnick, S. A., & Vogelzang, R. L. (2022). Ethical and legal issues involving medical social media. Seminars in Interventional Radiology, 39(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1745717
36. Suarez-Lledo, V., & Alvarez-Galvez, J. (2021). Prevalence of health misinformation on social media: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(1), e17187. https://doi.org/10.2196/17187
37. Mörelius, E., Robinson, S., Arabiat, D., & Whitehead, L. (2021). Digital interventions to improve health literacy among parents of children aged 0 to 12 years with a health condition: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(12), e31665. https://doi.org/10.2196/31665
38. Busse, T. S., Nitsche, J., Kernebeck, S., Jux, C., Weitz, J., Ehlers, J. P., & Bork, U. (2021). Approaches to improvement of digital health literacy (eHL) in the context of person-centered care. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(14), 8309. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148309
39. Fitzpatrick, P. J. (2023). Improving health literacy using the power of digital communications to achieve better health outcomes for patients and practitioners. Frontiers in Digital Health, 5, 1264780. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2023.1264780
40. South Africa. (2003). National Health Act No. 61 of 2003. Government Gazette. Retrieved from https://www.gov.za/documents/national-health-act-61-2003
41. Kirby, N., & Geel, J. (2023, June 7). The legal and ethical processing of healthcare information. Legal Brief. Available from https://www.werksmans.com/legal-updates-and-opinions/the-legal-and-ethical-processing-of-healthcare-information/
42. Adams, N.-R. (2024, October 15). Privacy and data protection in healthcare in South Africa. Data protection and privacy. Available from https://itlawco.com/privacy-and-data-protection-in-healthcare-in-south-africa/
43. Health Professions Council of South Africa. (2021). HPCSA media statement: Guidelines on telemedicine in South Africa. Retrieved from https://clinicalpsychologyforum.co.za/hpcsa-media-statement-guidelines-on-telemedicine-in-south-africa/
44. Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr. (2024). A new era for traditional healers: A step towards formalisation and regulation. Retrieved from https://www.cliffedekkerhofmeyr.com/en/news/publications/2024/Practice/Employment/employment-law-19-november-A-new-era-for-traditional-healers-A-step-towards-formalisation-and-regulation
45. DLA Piper. (n.d.). How is telehealth regulated? In South Africa - DLA Piper Telehealth Around the World. Retrieved from https://www.dlapiperintelligence.com/telehealth/countries/index.html?c=ZA&t=02-regulation-of-telehealth
46. Ferreira Caceres, M. M., Sosa, J. P., Lawrence, J. A., Sestacovschi, C., Tidd-Johnson, A., UI Rasool, M. H., Gadamidi, V. K., Ozair, S., Pandav, K., Cuevas-Lou, C., Parrish, M., Rodriguez, I., & Fernandez, J. P. (2022). The impact of misinformation on the COVID-19 pandemic. AIMS Public Health, 9(2), 262. https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2022018
47. Joseph, A. M., Fernandez, V., Kritzman, S., Eaddy, I., Cook, O. M., Lambros, S., Jara Silva, C. E., Arguelles, D., Abraham, C., Dorgham, N., Gilbert, Z. A., Chacko, L., Hirpara, R. J., Mayi, B. S., & Jacobs, R. J. (2022). COVID-19 misinformation on social media: A scoping review. Cureus, 14(4), e24601. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.24601
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The data used in this study were derived from secondary sources compiled through a comprehensive literature review. All data are publicly available and have been appropriately cited in the manuscript.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Michael Mncedisi Willie (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.