Women Power in Family Matters from Perspective of Intersectionality Theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55578/jlcas.2607.010Keywords:
Intersectionality Theory, women’s decision-making power, identity intersectionAbstract
The gender imbalance in women’s decision-making power under traditional patriarchy has long existed. Existing research mostly focuses on the lack of status among rural or low-income women. However, little is understood about the little and big ways in which the educated women in cities in China exert power in the family. Based on Intersectionality Theory, this study investigates the power practice of one highly educated urban professional woman. Four core family domains were examined: marital residence choice, bride price and dowry negotiation, household and childcare division of labor, and fertility decision-making. This pilot autoethnographic case study illustrates how the intersection of education, professional status, urban middle-class position, gender norms, and familial emotional dynamics shapes women’s decision-making power for a highly educated urban professional woman in contemporary China. Their power practices—equal negotiation, flexible adaptation, and autonomous leadership—are neither traditional gender domination nor confrontational resistance, yet they rest on the spouse’s career compromises, the unpaid intergenerational care labor of the mother-in-law, and the subject’s own cognitive and emotional management of familial relationships. This context-specific empowerment, rooted in daily negotiation and strategic compromise, remains conditional and relationally contingent rather than constituting a structural transformation of patriarchal arrangements. As a pilot study, it offers a tentative analytical dimension for understanding gender relations among similar demographic groups, one that future multi-case research can test and refine.
References
[1] Yoder, J. D., & Kahn, A. S. (1992). Toward a feminist understanding of women and power. Psychology of Women Quarterly, *16*(4), 471–486.
[2] Altay, S. (2019). Patriarchy and women's subordination: A theoretical analysis. Şarkiyat, *11*(1), 417–427. https://doi.org/10.26791/sarkiat.541704
[3] Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women's empowerment. Development and Change, *30*(3), 435–464.
[4] Shi, W. (2021). Jiātíng jīngyíng cèlüè xià de nóngcūn niánqīng nǚxìng jiātíng quánlì yǔ juésè shànbiàn [Family business strategies and the transformation of rural young women's family power and roles]. Zhōngguó nóngcūn guānchá (China Rural Survey), *43*(2), 89–106.
[5] Wiesner, M. (1987). Women and gender in early modern Europe. Cambridge University Press.
[6] Thompson, L., & Walker, A. J. (1989). Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work, and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, *51*(4), 873–886.
[7] Doss, C. (2013). Intrahousehold bargaining and resource allocation in developing countries. World Bank Research Observer, *28*, 52–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkt001
[8] Chen, F. Q. (2015). Húnán Shěng nǚxìng quánlì cānyù xiànzhuàng de diàochá fēnxī [An investigation and analysis of the current situation of women's power participation in Hunan Province]. Fùnǚ yánjiū lùncóng (Collection of Women's Studies), *31*(4), 52–60.
[9] Bogale, B., Belachew, T., & Mengistu, Y. (2011). Community cultural norms and women's decision-making power in marriage customs: Evidence from rural Ethiopia. African Journal of Reproductive Health, *15*(3), 67–78.
[10] Xu, A. Q. (2004). Fūqī quánlì móshì yǔ nǚxìng jiātíng dìwèi mǎnyìdù yánjiū [A study on spousal power models and women's satisfaction with family status]. Zhèjiāng xuékan (Zhejiang Academic Journal), *1*(2), 208–213.
[11] Kibria, N. (1990). Family ties: Vietnamese Americans and the immigrant experience. Cornell University Press.
[12] Demissie, S., Assefa, A., & Tadesse, M. (2022). Fertility decision-making autonomy among married women in sub-Saharan Africa: A multilevel analysis of demographic health surveys. BMC Public Health, *22*(1), 1–12.
[13] Annan, J., Donald, A., Goldstein, M., Gonzalez Martinez, P., & Koolwal, G. (2021). Taking power: Women's empowerment and household well-being in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Development, *140*, 105292.
[14] Guo, T. T. (2019). Jiātíng xìtǒng, shèhuì jiégòu yǔ nǚxìng jiātíng quánlì [Family system, social structure and women's family power]. Shèhuixué Pínglùn (Sociological Review), *7*(3), 68–82. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=cDHjH8kzCu2nYpHh2GjgV7bP6V65YaMO30YxaPLBs08gRWaR6T3BM9T-0afnCWnWK-uccnjCBg6PaQvhfRgcV-7Vc4x6AB-MTK2VWfqv75vpm-Fm8D9JRxopOzMr4G3MSBQHwoccDc7d7LfLyhxTWFz0YO5fgUDMc0UuEyci5ds5sF4U8_fJ5w==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS
[15] Odwe, G., Obare, F., Muthuri, S., Kisaakye, P., Habteyesus, D., Seruwagi, G., ... & Undie, C. C. (2025). Childhood exposure to intimate partner violence against women and its association with violence against children in refugee settlements in Uganda. Conflict and Health, *19*(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-025-00661-5
[16] Rathiranee, Y., & Semasinghe, S. (2017). Microfinance interventions and empowerment of women entrepreneurs in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Social Science and Technology, *2*(1), 51–66.
[17] Zhang, J. (2017). The evolution of China's one-child policy and its effects on family outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, *31*, 141–160.
[18] Wyatt, T., Johnson, M., & Zaidi, Z. (2022). Intersectionality: A means for centering power and oppression in research. Advances in Health Sciences Education, *27*, 863–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10110-0
[19] Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, (1), 139–167.
[20] Bauer, S., Gaskell, H., & Hawkins, K. (2021). Intersectionality as analytical sensibility: A methodological guide for qualitative researchers. Qualitative Research, *21*(4), 926–942.
[21] Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, *43*(6), 1241–1299.
[22] Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, *9*(1), 67–85.
[23] Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Handbook of Autoethnography, 3–14.
[24] Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications.
[25] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, *3*(2), 77–101.
[26] Horii, H. (2020). Walking a thin line: Taking children's decision to marry seriously? Childhood, *27*, 254–270.
[27] Lu, D., & Bellas, M. (2000). Chinese husbands' participation in household labor. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, *31*, 191–215.
[28] Zhou, H., Wang, X., & Li, M. (2024). Parental stress, coercive and encouraging parenting among Chinese one-child, two-child and three-child families. Families, Relationships and Societies, *13*(4), 528–548.
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study beyond the personal narrative presented.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shi-Fang Chen, Su Hie Ting (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.