Algorithmic Storytelling and the Posthuman Condition: A Transhumanist Reading of AI-Generated Narrative

Authors

  • Prasanth Arokia Samy D Assistant Professor, PG & Research Department of English, St. Joseph’s College (Autonomous), Affiliated to Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55578/jlcas.2604.007

Keywords:

transhumanism, algorithmic narrative, artificial intelligence, consciousness sharing, human enhancement

Abstract

This paper re-examines the relationship between transhumanism and algorithmic storytelling by closely analysing an AI-generated novel rather than broadly surveying technological developments. While earlier discussions often remain abstract, this study focuses on how transhumanist concepts particularly human enhancement, distributed cognition and posthuman identity are materially expressed within AI-generated narrative structures. Drawing on computational literary criticism, especially distant reading models, this paper argues that algorithmic storytelling does not merely replicate human narrative patterns but reorganizes them through probabilistic logic. Recent studies on AI authorship suggest that the boundaries between human and machine authorship are increasingly unstable and socially negotiated. Through selected excerpts from an AI-generated novel, the study identifies stylistic features such as recursive phrasing, semantic drift and non-linear coherence, which reflect a form of machine-mediated cognition. By situating these findings within recent debates on AI creativity and literary production, the paper suggests that AI-generated literature should be understood not as imitation, but as an emergent transhuman narrative form that expands, though unevenly, the boundaries of literary production.

References

[1] S. Elias, P. Khosla, and T. Nguyen, “Rethinking literary creativity in the age of artificial intelligence,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1-12, 2025.

[2] M. Eslami, F. Rahimi, and L. Chen, “Generative AI and the transformation of student writing practices,” Education Sciences, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 2025.

[3] L. Henrickson and L. Leppänen, “Revisiting computer authorship: A longitudinal perspective on reader perception,” AI & Society, early access, 2026.

[4] S. Jenner, D. Raidos, E. Anderson, S. Fleetwood, B. Ainsworth, K. Fox, J. Kreppner, and M. Barker, “Using large language models for narrative analysis: Opportunities and limitations,” Journal of Computational Humanities, early access, 2025.

[5] N. Bostrom, “In defense of posthuman dignity,” in H+/-: Transhumanism and Its Critics, G. R. Hansell and W. Grassie, Eds. Metanexus Institute, 2010, pp. 55-66.

[6] N. K. Hayles, How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. University of Chicago Press, 1999.

[7] J. Huxley, New Bottles for New Wine. Chatto & Windus, 1957.

[8] F. Moretti, Distant Reading. Verso, 2013.

[9] Booksby.ai, AI-generated science fiction novels. [Online]. Available: https://booksby.ai.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-20

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Algorithmic Storytelling and the Posthuman Condition: A Transhumanist Reading of AI-Generated Narrative. (2026). Journal of Literary, Cultural and Artistic Studies, 1(2), 78-91. https://doi.org/10.55578/jlcas.2604.007