AI-Driven Transformation of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG): A Systematic Review, Gap Analysis, and Future Research Agenda

Authors

  • Attia Gomaa Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Shubra, Benha University, Cairo, Egypt Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55578/jift.2606.007

Keywords:

ESG, Artificial Intelligence, Sustainability Governance, Socio-Technical Systems, Responsible AI, ESG Disclosure, Digital Transformation

Abstract

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) considerations have become a central framework for corporate accountability, regulatory compliance, and sustainable value creation amid growing environmental challenges, stakeholder expectations, and institutional pressures. At the same time, advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) are transforming ESG systems by enabling large-scale data integration, predictive sustainability analytics, automated reporting, and real-time governance intelligence. These developments are accelerating the digitalization of sustainability management and reshaping how organizations measure, disclose, and govern ESG performance.

This study conducts a systematic literature review to synthesize and critically evaluate the emerging body of research on AI-driven ESG transformation. Adopting a socio-technical governance perspective, the review conceptualizes AI-enabled ESG integration as a transformative process in which algorithmic systems increasingly influence sustainability assessment, disclosure, monitoring, and decision-making across organizational and institutional contexts. The findings reveal that despite significant technological progress, several barriers continue to constrain the effective application of AI in ESG. These include fragmented and inconsistent ESG data infrastructures, algorithmic bias and opacity, regulatory fragmentation, weak explainability and auditability mechanisms, and unresolved ethical, social, and environmental risks. The review also identifies important gaps related to cross-country regulatory evidence, lifecycle assessments of AI technologies, stakeholder trust, and mechanisms for enhancing ESG disclosure credibility while mitigating greenwashing and machine-washing risks.

Based on these findings, the study proposes a future research agenda emphasizing ESG data standardization, trustworthy and explainable AI, regulatory harmonization, governance integration, and interdisciplinary approaches to understanding the broader sustainability implications of AI-enabled ESG systems.

References

[1] Zhang, C., & Yang, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence and corporate ESG performance. International Review of Economics & Finance, *96*, 103713.

[2] Mukhtar, B., Shad, M. K., Ali, K., Woon, L. F., & Waqas, A. (2025). Systematic literature review and retrospective bibliometric analysis on ESG research. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, *74*(4), 1365–1399.

[3] Wang, Q., Qi, Y., & Li, R. (2026). Artificial intelligence and corporate sustainability: shaping the future of ESG in the age of industry 5.0. Sustainable Development, *34*(1), 1–26.

[4] Holmström, J. (2022). From AI to digital transformation: The AI readiness framework. Business Horizons, *65*(3), 329–339.

[5] Bhagra, M. L., Jakhar, M. T., Chouhan, M. M. K., & Gupta, M. S. (2024). Corporate Governance and ESG in Investment Decisions: An AI-Enhanced Perspective. Well Testing Journal, *33*, 591–611.

[6] Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard Business Review, *96*(1), 108–116.

[7] Abbas, J., Dabić, M., & Stojčić, N. (2026). Digital divide in Industry 5.0: Role of generative AI knowledge bases and intellectual capital in organizational resilience performance under territorial proximity. Technovation, *149*, 103357.

[8] Wu, J. Y., Nataraj, V., & Day, M. Y. (2025). Generative AI in ESG Reporting: A Systematic Review. In International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (pp. 337–352). Springer, Cham.

[9] Fethi, M. D., & Pasiouras, F. (2010). Assessing bank efficiency and performance with operational research and artificial intelligence techniques: A survey. European Journal of Operational Research, *204*(2), 189–198.

[10] Fan, W., Liu, J., Zhu, S., & Pardalos, P. M. (2020). Investigating the impacting factors for the healthcare professionals to adopt artificial intelligence-based medical diagnosis support system (AIMDSS). Annals of Operations Research, *294*(1), 567–592.

[11] Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Rafiee, S., Mohtasebi, S. S., Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., & Chau, K. W. (2018). Integration of artificial intelligence methods and life cycle assessment to predict energy output and environmental impacts of paddy production. Science of the Total Environment, *631*, 1279–1294.

[12] Benotsmane, R., Kovács, G., & Dudás, L. (2019). Economic, social impacts and operation of smart factories in Industry 4.0 focusing on simulation and artificial intelligence of collaborating robots. Social Sciences, *8*(5), 143.

[13] Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D., Sethi, S. P., & Sokolov, B. (2019). Scheduling in production, supply chain and Industry 4.0 systems by optimal control: fundamentals, state-of-the-art and applications. International Journal of Production Research, *57*(2), 411–432.

[14] Tomašev, N., Cornebise, J., Hutter, F., et al. (2020). AI for Social Good: Unlocking the Opportunity for Positive Impact. Nature Communications, *11*(1), 2468.

[15] Burnaev, E., Mironov, E., Shpilman, A., Mironenko, M., & Katalevsky, D. (2023). Practical AI cases for solving ESG challenges. Sustainability, *15*(17), 12731.

[16] Zhang, D. (2024). The pathway to curb greenwashing in sustainable growth: The role of artificial intelligence. Energy Economics, *133*, 107562.

[17] Li, N., Kim, M., Dai, J., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2024). Using artificial intelligence in ESG assurance. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, *21*(2), 83–99.

[18] Elhady, A. M., & Shohieb, S. (2025). AI-driven sustainable finance: computational tools, ESG metrics, and global implementation. Future Business Journal, *11*(1), 209.

[19] Chen, R., & Zhang, T. (2025). Artificial intelligence applications implication for ESG performance: can digital transformation of enterprises promote sustainable development? Chinese Management Studies, *19*(3), 676–701.

[20] Aljohani, A. (2025). A decision-support framework for evaluating AI-enabled ESG strategies in the context of sustainable manufacturing systems. Scientific Reports, *15*(1), 23864.

[21] Zhironkin, S., & Ezdina, N. (2023). Review of transition from mining 4.0 to mining 5.0 innovative technologies. Applied Sciences, *13*(8), 4917.

[22] Selim, O. (2020). ESG and AI: the beauty and the beast of sustainable investing. In Sustainable investing (pp. 227–243). Routledge.

[23] Ehsan, N. (2026). The Impact of AI-Driven ESG Compliance Monitoring on Corporate Sustainability Risk: Evidence from Publicly Listed Corporations (2016-2024). International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, *16*(3), 66.

[24] Khamisu, M. S., Khandelwal, N., & Paluri, R. A. (2026). Research Progress on Artificial Intelligence in Environmental Social and Governance (ESG). Discover Sustainability.

[25] Lim, T. (2024). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) and artificial intelligence in finance: State-of-the-art and research takeaways. Artificial Intelligence Review, *57*(4), 76.

[26] Handayani, M., & Nurzhavira, G. P. (2024). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as a Catalyst for ESG Integration in Marketing Strategies. International Journal of Economics, Business and Innovation Research, *3*(04), 198–211.

[27] Laviola, F., & Cucari, N. (2026). From Promise to Concern: Public Perceptions of AI in ESG Frameworks Over Time. Technology in Society, 103219.

[28] Bora, I., Duan, H. K., Vasarhelyi, M. A., Zhang, C., & Dai, J. (2021). The transformation of government accountability and reporting. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, *18*(2), 1–21.

[29] Chang, Y. L., & Ke, J. (2024). Socially responsible artificial intelligence empowered people analytics: a novel framework towards sustainability. Human Resource Development Review, *23*(1), 88–120.

[30] Visalli, F., Patrizio, A., Lanza, A., Papaleo, P., Nautiyal, A., Pupo, M., et al. (2023). ESG data collection with adaptive AI. In ICEIS (Vol. 1, pp. 468–475).

[31] Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., et al. (2019). Can Big Data and Predictive Analytics Improve Social and Environmental Sustainability? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, *144*, 534–545.

[32] Cai, C., Li, Y., & Tu, Y. (2024). Big data capabilities, ESG performance and corporate value. International Review of Economics & Finance, *96*, 103540.

[33] Caldarelli, G. (2025). Integration of blockchain in accounting and ESG reporting: A systematic review from an oracle-based perspective. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, *18*(9), 491.

[34] Ferraro, G., Quinto, I., Scandurra, G., & Thomas, A. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence and sustainability management on fostering ESG practices and competitive perspectives among SMEs. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, *32*(5), 6641–6657.

[35] Gandhi, A. K. (2025). Redefining ESG Compliance with Machine Learning and Predictive Analytics. International Journal of AI, BigData, Computational and Management Studies, *6*(2), 66–74.

[36] Li, J., Wu, T., Hu, B., Pan, D., & Zhou, Y. (2025). Artificial intelligence and corporate ESG performance. International Review of Financial Analysis, *102*, 104036.

[37] Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, *134*, 103–112.

[38] Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020). Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets. Journal of Political Economy, *128*(6), 2188–2244.

[39] Saxena, A., Singh, R., Gehlot, A., Akram, S. V., Twala, B., Singh, A., et al. (2022). Technologies empowered environmental, social, and governance (ESG): An industry 4.0 landscape. Sustainability, *15*(1), 309.

[40] Lin, B., & Zhu, Y. (2025). Does AI elevate corporate ESG performance? A supply chain perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, *34*(1), 586–597.

[41] Ningtyas, H. I. R., Mualim, W., & Nusron, A. (2026). Artificial Intelligence in The Application of ESG to Improve Company Reputation: The Moderating Role of Financial Performance. Journal of Accounting Science, *10*(1), 60–81.

[42] Wamba-Taguimdje, S. L., Wamba, S. F., Kamdjoug, J. R. K., & Wanko, C. E. T. (2020). Influence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Firm Performance: The Business Value of AI-Based Transformation Projects. Business Process Management Journal, *26*(7), 1893–1924.

[43] Truby, J. (2020). Governing Artificial Intelligence to Benefit the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainable Development, *28*(4), 946–959.

[44] Luo, Y., Tian, N., Wang, D., & Han, W. (2024). Does Digital Transformation Enhance Firm's ESG Performance? Evidence From an Emerging Market. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, *60*(4), 825–854.

[45] Chowdhury, S., Dey, P., Joel-Edgar, S., et al. (2023). Unlocking the Value of Artificial Intelligence in Human Resource Management Through AI Capability Framework. Human Resource Management Review, *33*(1), 100899.

[46] Salem, M. R., Azam, A. H. M., & Shahimi, S. (2026). When sustainability thinks: how artificial intelligence translates ESG pillars into risk discipline in ASEAN-5 banking. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 1–43.

[47] Kolbjørnsrud, V., Amico, R., & Thomas, R. J. (2016). How artificial intelligence will redefine management. Harvard Business Review, *2*(1), 3–10.

[48] Wilson, H. J., & Daugherty, P. R. (2018). Collaborative intelligence: Humans and AI are joining forces. Harvard Business Review, *96*(4), 114–123.

[49] Chen, S., Song, Y., & Gao, P. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and financial outcomes: Analyzing the impact of ESG on financial performance. Journal of Environmental Management, *345*, 118829.

[50] Naveed, K., Farooq, M. B., Zahir-Ul-Hassan, M. K., & Rauf, F. (2025). AI adoption, ESG disclosure quality and sustainability committee heterogeneity: evidence from Chinese companies. Meditari Accountancy Research, *33*(2), 708–732.

[51] Chen, J., Wang, N., Lin, T., Liu, B., & Hu, J. (2024). Shock or empowerment? Artificial intelligence technology and corporate ESG performance. Economic Analysis and Policy, *83*, 1080–1096.

[52] Liu, Y., Song, J., Zhou, B., & Liu, J. (2025). Artificial intelligence applications and corporate ESG performance. International Review of Economics & Finance, *104*, 104559.

[53] Trahan, R. T., & Jantz, B. (2023). What Is ESG? Rethinking the 'E' Pillar. Business Strategy and the Environment, *32*(7), 4382–4391.

[54] Nevi, G., Montera, R., Cucari, N., & Laviola, F. (2025). Integrating AI and ESG in digital platforms: New profiles of platform-based business models. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, *78*, 101913.

[55] Ren, X., Zeng, G., & Zhao, Y. (2023). Digital Finance and Corporate ESG Performance: Empirical Evidence From Listed Companies in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, *79*, 102019.

[56] Zhou, X., Li, G., Wang, Q., Li, Y., & Zhou, D. (2025). Artificial intelligence, corporate information governance and ESG performance: Quasi-experimental evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, *102*, 104087.

[57] Sulkowski, A., & Jebe, R. (2022). Evolving ESG reporting governance, regime theory, and proactive law: Predictions and strategies. American Business Law Journal, *59*(3), 449–503.

[58] Aureli, S., Del Baldo, M., Lombardi, R., & Nappo, F. (2020). Nonfinancial reporting regulation and challenges in sustainability disclosure and corporate governance practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, *29*(6), 2392–2403.

[59] Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, *5*(4), 210–233.

[60] Kim, S., & Li, Z. (2021). Understanding the impact of ESG practices in corporate finance. Sustainability, *13*(7), 3746.

[61] Huang, D. Z. (2021). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) activity and firm performance: A review and consolidation. Accounting & Finance, *61*(1), 335–360.

[62] Lee, J., & Koh, K. (2024). ESG performance and firm risk in the US financial firms. Review of Financial Economics, *42*(3), 328–344.

[63] Gao, B., Liu, H., Tong, S., & Jin, Y. (2025). Does ESG Performance Reduce Bankruptcy Risk? International Journal of Financial Studies, *13*(4), 221.

[64] Gidage, M., Bhide, S., Pahurkar, R., & Kolte, A. (2024). ESG performance and systemic risk nexus: role of firm-specific factors in Indian companies. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, *17*(9), 381.

[65] Liu, E. X., & Song, Y. (2025). ESG performance, environmental uncertainty, and firm risk. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, *36*(2), 292–322.

[66] Nishant, R., Kennedy, M., & Corbett, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence for sustainability: Challenges, opportunities, and a research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, *53*, 102104.

[67] Rodgers, W., Murray, J. M., Stefanidis, A., Degbey, W. Y., & Tarba, S. Y. (2023). An Artificial Intelligence Algorithmic Approach to Ethical Decision-Making in Human Resource Management Processes. Human Resource Management Review, *33*(1), 100925.

[68] Wang, A., Luo, K., & Nie, Y. (2024). Can artificial intelligence improve enterprise environmental performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Management, *370*, 123079.

[69] Niu, Y., Fu, Y., Liu, X., Harish, A. R., Li, M., & Huang, G. Q. (2024). Blockchain‐based incentive mechanism for environmental, social, and governance disclosure: a principal‐agent perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, *31*(6), 6318–6334.

[70] Nguyen, N. M., Abu Afifa, M. M., Thi Truc Dao, V., Van Bui, D., & Vo Van, H. (2026). Leveraging artificial intelligence and blockchain in accounting to boost ESG performance: the role of risk management and environmental uncertainty. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, *34*(4), 1268–1299.

[71] Raza, H., Khan, M. A., Mazliham, M., Alam, M. M., Aman, N., & Abbas, K. (2022). Applying Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Predicting the Environment, Social, and Governance (ESG) Pillar Score Based on Balance Sheet and Income Statement Data: A Case of Non-Financial Companies of USA, UK, and Germany. Frontiers in Environmental Science, *10*, 975487.

[72] Raimo, N., de Nuccio, E., & Vitolla, F. (2021). Corporate governance and ESG disclosure: A systematic review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, *28*(5), 1467–1486.

[73] Pluskota, P., Słupińska, K., Wawrzyniak, A., & Wąsikowska, B. (2026). The Application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Implementation of ESG-Oriented Sustainable Development Strategies in the Banking Sector: A Case Study. Sustainability, *18*(2), 732.

[74] Asif, M., Searcy, C., & Castka, P. (2023). ESG and Industry 5.0: The Role of Technologies in Enhancing ESG Disclosure. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, *195*, 122806.

[75] Lo, W., Yang, C. M., Zhang, Q., & Li, M. (2024). Increased Productivity and Reduced Waste With Robotic Process Automation and Generative AI-Powered IoE Services. Journal of Web Engineering, *23*(1), 53–87.

[76] Drydakis, N. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Reduced SMEs' Business Risks: A Dynamic Capabilities Analysis During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Information Systems Frontiers, *24*(4), 1223–1247.

[77] Bagstad, K. J., Reed, J. M., Semmens, D. J., Sherrouse, B. C., & Troy, A. (2016). Linking biophysical models and public preferences for ecosystem service assessments: a case study for the Southern Rocky Mountains. Regional Environmental Change, *16*(7), 2005–2018.

[78] Demirci, M., Üneş, F., & Körlü, S. (2019). Modeling of groundwater level using artificial intelligence techniques: a case study of Reyhanli region in Turkey. Applied Ecology & Environmental Research, *17*(2).

[79] Wang, Z., & Srinivasan, R. S. (2017). A review of artificial intelligence-based building energy use prediction: Contrasting the capabilities of single and ensemble prediction models. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, *75*, 796–808.

[80] Camaréna, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence in the design of the transitions to sustainable food systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, *271*, 122574.

[81] Feng, F., Li, J., Zhang, F., & Sun, J. (2024). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Green Innovation Efficiency: Moderating Role of Dynamic Capability. International Review of Economics and Finance, *96*, 103649.

[82] Lin, J., Zeng, Y., Wu, S., & Luo, X. R. (2024). How does artificial intelligence affect the environmental performance of organizations? The role of green innovation and green culture. Information & Management, *61*(2), 103924.

[83] Schwartz, R., Dodge, J., Smith, N. A., & Etzioni, O. (2020). Green ai. Communications of the ACM, *63*(12), 54–63.

[84] Figueroa-Armijos, M., Clark, B. B., & da Motta Veiga, S. P. (2023). Ethical Perceptions of AI in Hiring and Organizational Trust: The Role of Performance Expectancy and Social Influence. Journal of Business Ethics, *186*(1), 179–197.

[85] Varma, A., Dawkins, C., & Chaudhuri, K. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and People Management: A Critical Assessment Through the Ethical Lens. Human Resource Management Review, *33*(1), 100923.

[86] Cheng, L., Varshney, K. R., & Liu, H. (2021). Socially responsible ai algorithms: Issues, purposes, and challenges. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, *71*, 1137–1181.

[87] Qian, Y., Siau, K. L., & Nah, F. F. (2024). Societal impacts of artificial intelligence: Ethical, legal, and governance issues. Societal Impacts, *3*, 100040.

[88] Bughin, J., Hazan, E., Lund, S., Dahlström, P., Wiesinger, A., & Subramaniam, A. (2018). Skill shift: Automation and the future of the workforce. McKinsey Global Institute, *1*(2018), 3–84.

[89] Autor, D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, *29*(3), 3–30.

[90] Kekez, I., Lauwaert, L., & Ređep, N. B. (2025). Is artificial intelligence (AI) research biased and conceptually vague? A systematic review of research on bias and discrimination in the context of using AI in human resource management. Technology in Society, *81*, 102818.

[91] Xiao, Y., & Xiao, L. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence-driven ESG performance on sustainable development of central state-owned enterprises listed companies. Scientific Reports, *15*(1), 8548.

[92] Sklavos, G., Theodossiou, G., Papanikolaou, Z., Karelakis, C., & Ragazou, K. (2024). Environmental, social, and governance-based artificial intelligence governance: Digitalizing firms' leadership and human resources management. Sustainability, *16*(16), 7154.

[93] Erel, I., Stern, L. H., Tan, C., & Weisbach, M. S. (2021). Selecting directors using machine learning. The Review of Financial Studies, *34*(7), 3226–3264.

[94] Lee, S. U., Perera, H., Liu, Y., Xia, B., Lu, Q., Zhu, L., et al. (2025). Integrating ESG and AI: a comprehensive responsible AI assessment framework. AI and Ethics, *5*(5), 5121–5148.

[95] Cubric, M. (2020). Drivers, barriers and social considerations for AI adoption in business and management: A tertiary study. Technology in Society, *62*, 101257.

[96] Mikalef, P., Conboy, K., Lundström, J. E., & Popovič, A. (2022). Thinking responsibly about responsible AI and 'the dark side' of AI. European Journal of Information Systems, *31*(3), 257–268.

[97] Anderson, T., Sarkar, S., & Kelley, R. (2024). Analyzing public sentiment on sustainability: A comprehensive review and application of sentiment analysis techniques. Natural Language Processing Journal, *8*, 100097.

[98] Bucur, C., Tudorica, B., Andrei, J. V., Dusmanescu, D., Paraschiv, D., & Teodor, C. (2024). Sentiment analysis of global news on environmental issues: insights into public perception and its impact on low-carbon economy transition. Frontiers in Environmental Science, *12*, 1360304.

[99] Floridi, L. (2019). Translating principles into practices of digital ethics: Five risks of being unethical. Philosophy & Technology, *32*(2), 185–193.

[100] Morley, J., Floridi, L., Kinsey, L., & Elhalal, A. (2021). From what to how: an initial review of publicly available AI ethics tools, methods and research to translate principles into practices. In Ethics, governance, and policies in artificial intelligence (pp. 153–183). Springer International Publishing.

[101] Hilb, M. (2020). Toward artificial governance? The role of artificial intelligence in shaping the future of corporate governance: M. Hilb. Journal of Management and Governance, *24*(4), 851–870.

[102] Truby, J., Brown, R. D., Ibrahim, I. A., & Parellada, O. C. (2022). A sandbox approach to regulating high-risk artificial intelligence applications. European Journal of Risk Regulation, *13*(2), 270–294.

[103] Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, *1*(9), 389–399.

[104] Tian, H., Wang, J., & Cai, Y. (2025). Artificial intelligence adoption and corporate ESG performance. Business Strategy and the Environment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70032

[105] Alkaraan, F., Albitar, K., Hussainey, K., & Venkatesh, V. G. (2022). Corporate transformation toward Industry 4.0 and financial performance: The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, *175*, 121423.

[106] De Villiers, C., Dimes, R., & Molinari, M. (2024). How will AI text generation and processing impact sustainability reporting? Critical analysis, a conceptual framework and avenues for future research. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, *15*(1), 96–118.

[107] Suárez Giri, F., & Sánchez Chaparro, T. (2024). Unveiling the blackbox within ESG ratings' blackbox: Toward a framework for analyzing AI adoption and its impacts. Business Strategy & Development, *7*(4), e70038.

[108] Nelson, W. (2024). From data to decisions: How emerging technologies can enhance ESG assessments and reporting. Journal of Financial Compliance, *8*(1), 54–64.

[109] Ghosh, A., Saini, A., & Barad, H. (2025). Artificial intelligence in governance: recent trends, risks, challenges, innovative frameworks and future directions. AI & SOCIETY, *40*(7), 5685–5707.

[110] Uyar, A., Kilic, M., Koseoglu, M. A., Kuzey, C., & Karaman, A. S. (2020). The link among board characteristics, corporate social responsibility performance, and financial performance: Evidence from the hospitality and tourism industry. Tourism Management Perspectives, *35*, 100714.

[111] Zhang, X., Zhao, X., & Qu, L. (2021). Do green policies catalyze green investment? Evidence from ESG investing developments in China. Economics Letters, *207*, 110028.

[112] Bolón-Canedo, V., Morán-Fernández, L., Cancela, B., & Alonso-Betanzos, A. (2024). A review of green artificial intelligence: Towards a more sustainable future. Neurocomputing, *599*, 128096.

[113] Lykou, G., Mentzelioti, D., & Gritzalis, D. (2018). A new methodology toward effectively assessing data center sustainability. Computers & Security, *76*, 327–340.

[114] Rohde, F., Wagner, J., Meyer, A., Reinhard, P., Voss, M., Petschow, U., et al. (2024). Broadening the perspective for sustainable artificial intelligence: sustainability criteria and indicators for Artificial Intelligence systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, *66*, 101411.

[115] Khan, M. K., Huo, C., Zahid, R. A., & Maqsood, U. S. (2024). The automated sustainability auditor: does artificial intelligence curtail greenwashing behavior in Chinese firms? Business Strategy and the Environment, *33*(8), 9015–9039.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-22

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting this study are contained within the article.

Issue

Section

Review

How to Cite

AI-Driven Transformation of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG): A Systematic Review, Gap Analysis, and Future Research Agenda. (2026). Journal of International Financial Trends, 2(2), 88-113. https://doi.org/10.55578/jift.2606.007