Agricultural Technology, Functional Scale and Localized Value Creation: Pathways to Structural Transformation in Bihar, India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55578/w0z2mx94Keywords:
Agricultural technology, functional scale, localized value creation, land fragmentation, organizational scale, structural transformationAbstract
Agricultural transformation in developing agrarian economies depends not only on technological progress and increased productive capacity, but also on the capacity to deploy technological gains at economically viable scale and connect them with downstream value-adding activities. This study examines the role of functional scale in linking agricultural technological development with localized value-creation potential and broader structural transformation in Bihar, India. It develops a state-level analytical framework in which agricultural technology contributes to productive capacity and marketable output, while organizational and institutional arrangements influence the capacity to translate dispersed production into aggregation, processing, agrifood services, and wider economic transformation. Drawing on official state-level economic and agricultural statistics, the study finds that Bihar has a substantial and increasingly intensified agricultural production base. Cropping intensity increased from 147% in 2023–24 to 152% in 2024–25, while cereal production rose from 227.17 to 243.91 lakh tonnes. Indicators of functional-scale capacity also expanded: registered Farmer Producer Organizations increased from 221 in 2021 to 580 in 2024, and cumulative Custom Hiring Centres increased from 397 by 2019–20 to 832 by 2025. Downstream capacity is evidenced by 353 operational food-processing units and 12 operational ethanol units by September 2024. These observations demonstrate productive, institutional, and downstream capacity, but do not establish the proportion of agricultural value retained within Bihar. Localized value creation is therefore interpreted as an empirically supported potential and transformation pathway rather than a directly measured outcome. The study concludes that small ownership need not imply small-scale economic organization and that functional-scale institutions can provide an inclusive pathway for technology-enabled structural transformation.
References
[1] Alonso, C., & MacDonald, M. (2024). Advancing India's structural transformation and catch-up to the technology frontier (IMF Working Paper No. 2024/138). International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400281617.001
[2] Rakholia, R., Tailor, J., Prajapati, M., Shah, M., & Saini, J. R. (2024). Emerging technology adoption for sustainable agriculture in India: A pilot study. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 17, Article 101238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101238
[3] Sinha, J. K. (2019). Influence of technologies on the growth rate of GDP from agriculture: A case study of sustaining economic growth of the agriculture sector in Bihar. Statistical Journal of the IAOS, 35(2), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.3233/SJI-180436
[4] Singh, R. K. P., Singh, K. M., & Kumar, A. (2015). A study on adoption of modern agricultural technologies at farm level in Bihar. Economic Affairs, 60(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-4666.2015.00005.4
[5] Patil, V., & Veettil, P. C. (2024). Farmers' risk attitude, agricultural technology adoption and impacts in Eastern India. Agriculture & Food Security, 13, Article 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-024-00497-x
[6] Jat, R. K., Meena, V. S., Durgude, S., et al. (2024). Bridging the gap: Challenges and adoption of climate-resilient agriculture technologies in agricultural landscapes across agro-climatic zones of Bihar, India. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 8, Article 1504388. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1504388
[7] Sattar, A., Jha, R. K. R., Kumar, S., et al. (2025). Micro-level sustainability benefits through weather-based farm interventions in Bihar, India. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 9, Article 1491153. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1491153
[8] Mishra, J. S., Doharey, R. K., Meena, N. R., Sonu, K., & Deekshith, B. (2025). Adoption of climate-smart agriculture in flood-affected regions of Darbhanga. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 61(3), 64–68. https://doi.org/10.48165/IJEE.2025.61312
[9] Meena, V. S., Jat, R. K., Durgude, S. A., et al. (2026). Conservation agriculture for sustainable rice-maize systems in Bihar, India. Field Crops Research, 337, Article 110275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2025.110275
[10] Lewis, W. A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. The Manchester School, 22(2), 139–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1954.tb00021.x
[11] Johnston, B. F., & Mellor, J. W. (1961). The role of agriculture in economic development. American Economic Review, 51(4), 566–593.
[12] Schultz, T. W. (1964). Transforming traditional agriculture. Yale University Press.
[13] Timmer, C. P. (1988). The agricultural transformation. In H. Chenery & T. N. Srinivasan (Eds.), Handbook of development economics (Vol. 1, pp. 275–331). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4471(88)01011-3
[14] Barrett, C. B., Ortiz-Bobea, A., & Pham, T. (2023). Structural transformation, agriculture, climate, and the environment. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 17(2), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1086/725319
[15] Hazell, P., Haggblade, S., & Reardon, T. (2024). Transformation of the rural nonfarm economy during rapid urbanization and structural transformation in developing regions. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 16, 277–299. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-101623-105713
[16] Li, C., Luo, C., Jia, H., Yue, M., & Wu, L. (2025). Advancing agricultural economic growth through technology innovation and structural transformation: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(4), Article 100743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100743
[17] Lidder, P., Cattaneo, A., & Chaya, M. (2025). Innovation and technology for achieving resilient and inclusive rural transformation. Global Food Security, 44, Article 100827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100827
[18] Yi, J., Jiang, S., Tran, D., et al. (2025). Agrifood value chain employment and compensation shift with structural transformation. Nature Food, 6, 868–880. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-025-01225-9
[19] Jayalath, M. M., Ratnayake, R. M. C., Perera, H. N., & Thibbotuwawa, A. (2025). Digitalizing traditional agri-food supply chains in developing economies: A pathway to regulated sustainable governance. Sustainable Futures, 10, Article 101356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101356
[20] Nana, I., & Tabe-Ojong, M. P. J. (2026). Global agrifood value chains, structural transformation and income inequality. Agricultural Economics, 57(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70097
[21] Aslam, M., & Fazal, S. (2025). Exploring the impact of land fragmentation on the performance of agriculture: A systematic review. Discover Agriculture, 3, Article 55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-025-00207-6
[22] Ramana, M. V., Kumari, C. P., Karthik, R., Alibaba, M., Reddy, G. K., Chiranjeevi, K., et al. (2025). Integrated farming systems improve the income of small farm holdings—an overview of earlier findings in the Indian context. Food and Energy Security, 14, Article e70064. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.70064
[23] Bijarniya, D., Groot, J. C. J., Jat, M. L., Adelhart Toorop, R., Lopez-Ridaura, S., Kalvania, K. C., et al. (2024). Holistic analysis of cropping diversity and intensity implications for productive, environmental, and nutritional performance of smallholder farms in Bihar, India. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 8, Article 1393129. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1393129
[24] Government of Bihar, Department of Agriculture. (2023). Fourth Agriculture Roadmap 2023–28. Government of Bihar.
[25] Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Government of Bihar. (2026). Bihar statistical profile and state income estimates 2024–25. Government of Bihar.
[26] Government of Bihar. (2025). Bihar Economic Survey 2024–25. Finance Department, Government of Bihar.
[27] Sinha, J. K. (2025). Agricultural value addition and economic linkages in Bihar: An empirical analysis of growth dynamics. Journal of Economic Development, Innovation and Policy, 1(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.55578/jedip.2506.002
[28] Sinha, J. K., & Sinha, A. K. (2025). Sustainable agricultural development under the influence of technology: A case study of Bihar. New Countryside, 4(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.55121/nc.v4i1.385
[29] Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Government of Bihar. (2026). Agricultural statistics, state income estimates and sectoral indicators for Bihar. Government of Bihar.
[30] Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India. (2026). Agricultural statistics at a glance 2024. Government of India.
[31] Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare. (2019). Agricultural census 2015–16: Bihar. Government of India.
[32] Markelova, H., Meinzen-Dick, R., Hellin, J., & Dohrn, S. (2009). Collective action for smallholder market access. Food Policy, 34(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.10.001
[33] Barrett, C. B. (2008). Smallholder market participation: Concepts and evidence from eastern and southern Africa. Food Policy, 33(4), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.10.005
[34] Dev, S. M., Rao, N. C., Singh, R., et al. (2021). Small Farmers Large Field (SFLF): A synchronized collective action model for improving the livelihood of small farmers in India. Food Security, 13, 1459–1474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-021-01236-x
[35] Bolhuis, M., Rachapalli, S., & Restuccia, D. (2026). Misallocation in Indian agriculture. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 18(2), 378–408. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20210358
[36] Goyal, Y., Choudhury, P. R., & Ghosh, R. K. (2022). Informal land leasing in rural India persists because it is credible. Land Use Policy, 120, Article 106299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106299
[37] Deininger, K., & Jin, S. (2008). Efficiency and equity impacts of rural land rental restrictions: Evidence from India. European Economic Review, 52(5), 892–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2007.09.003
[38] NITI Aayog. (2015). Raising agricultural productivity and making farming remunerative for farmers. Government of India.
[39] Verma, S., Sonkar, V. K., Kumar, A., & Roy, D. (2019). Are farmer producer organizations a boon to farmers? The evidence from Bihar, India. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 32(Conference Number), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0279.2019.00022.3
[40] Singh, S., Sharma, A., Singh, A., Praveen, K. V., Singh, H., & Kumawat, P. K. (2026). What makes farmer producer organizations work? A multi-level analysis of performance determinants in India. Journal of Rural Studies, 123, Article 104014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104014
[41] Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India. (2026). Sub-Mission on Agricultural Mechanization: Strategic pillars for enhancing farm productivity and post-harvest value addition. Government of India.
[42] Shukla, A., Pandey, N., Raghuwanshi, J., et al. (2026). Investigating barriers to technology adoption in Indian agriculture: A parallel mediation analysis of awareness, attitude, and agronomic practices. Discover Sustainability, 7, Article 1004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-00793-x
[43] Sinha, J. K., & Sinha, A. K. (2024). Harnessing technology for sustainable agriculture: A case study from Bihar, India. Open Access Journal of Agricultural Research, 9(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.23880/oajar-16000365
[44] Sinha, J. K. (2026). Agricultural value addition and structural transformation in a developing agrarian economy: Evidence from Bihar, India. Journal of Economic Development, Innovation and Policy, 2(2), 196–226. https://doi.org/10.55578/jedip.2608.012
[45] Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare. (2024). State-wise number of Farmer Producer Organisations registered under the Central Sector Scheme for Formation and Promotion of 10,000 FPOs. Government of India.
[46] Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare. (2025). Sub-Mission on Agricultural Mechanization: Custom Hiring Centres and shared mechanization infrastructure. Government of India.
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The study is based entirely on secondary data obtained from publicly available sources. The datasets supporting the findings were compiled from official publications and databases of the Government of India, the Government of Bihar and other publicly accessible institutional sources cited in the References. No primary data were generated for this study. The underlying data are available from the respective source organizations and publications, and sufficient bibliographic information has been provided to facilitate verification and replication.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jitendra Kumar Sinha (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.