Large Language Model Driven Distributed Robust Multi-Criteria Optimization Decision Method with Interval Binary Linguistic Considering Uncertain Cognitive Preferences — A Case of Heterogeneous Stakeholder Collaborative System for Trans-Regional Carbon Governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55578/jdso.2608.009Keywords:
Interval binary linguistic, Large language model, Distributed robust optimization, Multi-criteria decision-making, Trans-regional carbon governance, Heterogeneous stakeholdersAbstract
Trans-regional carbon governance is a complex system with diverse stakeholders, conflicting indicators, fuzzy cognition and multi-source uncertainties. Traditional MCDM methods use manual weighting and single-agent frameworks, which cannot accurately capture stakeholders’ vague preferences or withstand external disturbances. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a distributed robust multi-criteria optimization decision method combining interval binary linguistic information and large language model (LLM). First, interval binary linguistic variables describe stakeholders’ dual uncertain cognition in carbon governance. We design fusion operators to reduce information loss during evaluation aggregation.
Secondly, an implicit preference mining module based on LLM is designed to quantitatively extract risk preference, fairness preference and bounded rationality of decision-makers, so as to realize dynamic and intelligent weight optimization instead of subjective manual weighting. Thirdly, a distributed robust multi-objective optimization model is established for heterogeneous regional governance subjects to balance economic development, carbon emission reduction and governance cost under multiple uncertainties. Finally, a practical case of trans-regional carbon collaborative governance is used for empirical verification, and comparative analysis with classic multi-criteria decision methods is conducted. Results verify its high robustness and practicability, offering a novel framework for intelligent optimization of complex public governance systems.
References
[1] Liu, H., et al. (2022). Uncertain decision-making of carbon allocation under multi-region linkage. Sustainable Cities and Society, *87*, 104219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104219
[2] Mardani, A., et al. (2020). Multi-criteria decision-making methods for sustainable energy management: A systematic review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, *129*, 109932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109932
[3] Chen, X., et al. (2022). Weight determination methods in fuzzy multi-criteria decision making: A comparative study. Expert Systems with Applications, *201*, 117234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117234
[4] Gao, S., et al. (2022). Robust optimization for regional carbon emission scheduling under policy uncertainty. Energy, *251*, 123908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123908
[5] Atanassov, K. T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, *20*(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(86)90034-7
[6] Herrera, F., & Martínez, L. (2000). A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, *8*(6), 746–752. https://doi.org/10.1109/91.890332
[7] Wang, P., & Zhang, H. (2019). Binary linguistic group decision making based on new aggregation operators. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, *37*(3), 4123–4134. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-181754
[8] Yildirim, S., et al. (2023). Deep learning based production scheduling optimization. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, *68*, 512–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.07.011
[9] Wu, X., et al. (2021). Multi-objective optimization of regional carbon governance system. Journal of Cleaner Production, *312*, 127746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127746
[10] Yu, L., et al. (2022). Robust carbon emission allocation under demand uncertainty. Applied Energy, *316*, 119087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119087
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The statistical data used in the case study are derived from publicly available government sources and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The LLM-generated preference scores are provided as supplementary materials accompanying this manuscript. No other new data were created in this study.
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jialei Nie (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.